1999 Audi A2 vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi A2 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1670 kg more than 1999 Audi A2.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A2 | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Audi | Fisker |
Model | A2 | Karma |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 36 L |