1999 Audi A3 vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1999 Audi A3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi A3 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi A3 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A3 | 1966 Renault 4 | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | A3 | 4 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |