1999 Audi A4 vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1999 Audi A4 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi A4 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A4 | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | A4 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 33 L |