1999 Audi A4 vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1999 Audi A4 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi A4 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Because 1982 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A4 | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Audi | Skoda |
Model | A4 | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |