1999 Audi A4 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1999 Audi A4 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi A4. (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A4 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | A4 | Etna |
Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 331 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2520 mm |