1999 Audi A6 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 1999 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi A6 (123 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1999 Audi A6.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi A6. (168 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A6 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A6 | 40 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3090 mm |