1999 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi A6 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi A6 (149 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi A6 (210 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1999 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A6 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Micra |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 46 L |