1999 Audi R8 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1999 Audi R8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,596 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 546 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 1132 kg more than 1999 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi R8 (705 Nm) has 542 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 1999 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi R8 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | R8 | EJ |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3596 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 705 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1480 mm |
