1999 Audi R8 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1999 Audi R8 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,596 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 584 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 658 kg more than 1999 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi R8 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | R8 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3596 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1390 mm |
