1999 Audi R8 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1999 Audi R8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,596 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi R8 (610 HP) has 415 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 1999 Audi R8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Audi R8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi R8 (705 Nm) has 503 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1999 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi R8 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | R8 | FTO |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3596 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 705 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1300 mm |
