1999 Audi R8R vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 Audi R8R is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1999 Audi R8R. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi R8R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 2216 kg more than 1999 Audi R8R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi R8R. (330 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi R8R.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi R8R | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | R8R | 62 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3898 cc | 6381 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 583 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 2218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1430 mm |