1999 Audi R8R vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1999 Audi R8R is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi R8R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi R8R (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi R8R should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 742 kg more than 1999 Audi R8R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi R8R (330 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 1999 Audi R8R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi R8R | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Audi | ZAZ |
Model | R8R | 966 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 3898 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1380 mm |