1999 Audi R8R vs. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1999 Audi R8R is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi R8R (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi R8R should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1443 kg more than 1999 Audi R8R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi R8R (330 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. (291 Nm). This means 1999 Audi R8R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi R8R | 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | R8R | Camaro |
Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3898 cc | 4375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 291 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1260 mm |