1999 Audi R8R vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1999 Audi R8R is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 3,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi R8R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi R8R (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi R8R should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1999 Audi R8R.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Audi R8R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi R8R (330 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm). This means 1999 Audi R8R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi R8R | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
| Make | Audi | Daihatsu |
| Model | R8R | Taft |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 3898 cc | 958 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1830 mm |
