1999 Audi R8R vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi R8R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi R8R would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1999 Audi R8R. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi R8R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi R8R (330 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1999 Audi R8R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460. 1999 Audi R8R has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford ST 460 has manual transmission. 2000 Ford ST 460 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Audi R8R will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi R8R | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | R8R | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3898 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |