1999 Audi R8R vs. 2001 Nissan Moco
To start off, 2001 Nissan Moco is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi R8R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi R8R would be higher. At 3,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi R8R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi R8R (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Moco. (53 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi R8R should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Moco. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Moco weights approximately 1068 kg more than 1999 Audi R8R.
Because 1999 Audi R8R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Audi R8R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Moco, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi R8R (330 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Moco. (64 Nm). This means 1999 Audi R8R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Moco.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi R8R | 2001 Nissan Moco | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | R8R | Moco |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 3898 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 64 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1600 mm |
