1999 Audi RS4 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1999 Audi RS4 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi RS4 (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1999 Audi RS4.
Because 1999 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi RS4 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS4 | 60 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3230 mm |
