1999 Audi RS4 vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1999 Audi RS4 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi RS4 (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi RS4 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi RS4 | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | RS4 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2040 mm |