1999 Audi RS4 vs. 1962 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1999 Audi RS4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 515 kg more than 1999 Audi RS4.
Because 1999 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi RS4 | 1962 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS4 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |
