1999 Audi RS4 vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1999 Audi RS4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi RS4 (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi RS4 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi RS4 | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | RS4 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 33 L |