1999 Audi RS4 vs. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi RS4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi RS4 would be higher. At 5,377 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1999 Audi RS4. (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi RS4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 780 kg more than 1999 Audi RS4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward has automatic transmission and 1999 Audi RS4 has manual transmission. 1999 Audi RS4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi RS4 | 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | RS4 | Park Ward |
Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5377 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 100 L |