1999 Audi RS4 vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi RS4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi RS4 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi RS4 (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 696 kg more than 1999 Audi RS4.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi RS4 | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | RS4 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2316 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |
