1999 Audi S8 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1999 Audi S8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi S8 (247 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi S8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi S8 weights approximately 616 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi S8 (330 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1999 Audi S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi S8 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | S8 | EJ |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4170 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2680 mm |