1999 Audi S8 vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi S8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi S8 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi S8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 517 kg more than 1999 Audi S8.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi S8. (331 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi S8.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi S8 | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | S8 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 331 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 2247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 20.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 95 L |