1999 Audi S8 vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi S8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi S8 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2011 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi S8 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi S8 weights approximately 340 kg more than 2011 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi S8 (331 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1999 Audi S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Audi S8 2011 Mazda RX-8
Make Audi Mazda
Model S8 RX-8
Year Released 1999 2011
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4172 cc 1300 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 335 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 8500 RPM
Torque 331 Nm 215 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 5500 RPM
Drive Type AWD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1730 kg 1390 kg
Vehicle Length 5040 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1341 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2703 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.7 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 20.8 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 64 L