1999 Audi S8 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi S8 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1999 Audi S8. (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi S8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 185 kg more than 1999 Audi S8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi S8. (331 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi S8.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi S8 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S8 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 331 Nm | 746 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 20.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |