1999 Audi S8 vs. 2012 Ford E-350
To start off, 2012 Ford E-350 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi S8 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1999 Audi S8. (247 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi S8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1999 Audi S8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-350 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi S8. (330 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi S8.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi S8 | 2012 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S8 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4170 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.5 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.7 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 132 L |