1999 Audi TT vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi TT | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | 62 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3210 mm |
