1999 Audi TT vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi TT weights approximately 240 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi TT | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Audi | Maserati |
| Model | TT | A6G |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2560 mm |
