1999 Audi TT vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Singer SM 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (98 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Audi | Singer |
Model | TT | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 98 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2320 mm |