1999 Audi TT vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi TT weights approximately 105 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi TT | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | TT | RM A |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2870 mm |
