1999 Audi TT vs. 1960 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 802 kg more than 1999 Audi TT.
Because 1960 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1960 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | DeVille |
Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2050 mm |