1999 Audi TT vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi TT | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 63 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1770 mm |
