1999 Audi TT vs. 1962 Austin A 99
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi TT | 1962 Austin A 99 | |
| Make | Audi | Austin |
| Model | TT | A 99 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 83.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2800 mm |
