1999 Audi TT vs. 1966 Ford Corsair
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1966 Ford Corsair. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Corsair.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Corsair. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Corsair. (101 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi TT | 1966 Ford Corsair | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | Corsair |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2570 mm |
