1999 Audi TT vs. 1966 Rover P5
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1966 Rover P5. (122 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Rover P5.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Rover P5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Rover P5. (217 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1966 Rover P5 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | P5 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2820 mm |