1999 Audi TT vs. 1975 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1975 Datsun 280Z.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Datsun 280Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Audi TT | 1975 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Audi | Datsun |
| Model | TT | 280Z |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2304 mm |
