1999 Audi TT vs. 1982 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 30 kg more than 1999 Audi TT.

Because 1982 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Audi TT 1982 Ford Falcon
Make Audi Ford
Model TT Falcon
Year Released 1999 1982
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 3271 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 178 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 2400 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1340 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2830 mm