1999 Audi TT vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi TT weights approximately 285 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | TT | Celica |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |