1999 Audi TT vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Ranger |
Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |