1999 Audi TT vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi TT weights approximately 255 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 626 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |