1999 Audi TT vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 626 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |