1999 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | TT | Cougar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 3798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |