1999 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 520 kg more than 1999 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Challenger |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2730 mm |