1999 Audi TT vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1999 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (237 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Space Runner |
Year Released | 1999 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 164 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2530 mm |