1999 Audi TT vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi TT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Artic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi TT. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi TT. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1999 Audi TT has manual transmission. 1999 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Artic |
Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3200 mm |