1999 Audi TT vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1999 Audi TT. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi TT. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 4161 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3280 mm |