1999 Audi TT vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1999 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 270 kg more than 1999 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi TT. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1999 Audi TT has manual transmission. 1999 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Audi TT 2005 Jaguar XJ
Make Audi Jaguar
Model TT XJ
Year Released 1999 2005
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 178 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 525 Nm
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.1:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1465 kg 1735 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.1 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.3 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 84 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]