1999 Audi TT vs. 2005 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2005 Mazda B2500 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,030 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B2500 (204 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1999 Audi TT. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B2500 (323 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi TT. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 2005 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | B2500 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 4030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 323 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2990 mm |