1999 Audi TT vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1999 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Audi TT weights approximately 75 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 1999 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1999 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi TT | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 61 L |